Amazon Fire stick TV lawsuit: Are you affected? Here’s what to know
A digital media player stick for online streaming ( Amazon Fire TV Stick ) is held over a laptop on April 18, 2017 in Berlin, Germany. (Photo Illustration by Thomas Trutschel/Photothek via Getty Images)
LOS ANGELES - A class action lawsuit in California accuses Amazon of misleading customers by marketing its early Fire TV Stick devices as "instant" streaming with no buffering, then later "bricking" them and rendering them nearly unusable.
Dig deeper:
According to the complaint obtained by FOX Television Stations, Amazon promoted its Fire TV Stick devices as fast, easy-to-use products that delivered "instant" streaming without buffering.
But according to the complaint, the company failed to disclose that it could later discontinue software support—effectively stripping the devices of their core functionality and leaving them nearly unusable for many consumers.
RELATED: 2026 streaming price hikes: Netflix, Spotify, YouTube & more [See the List]
The lawsuit alleges that by removing support, Amazon forced customers to upgrade to newer versions to regain the same "instant" streaming experience. Consumers were never warned at the time of purchase that the devices’ ability to stream content could be reduced or eliminated at any time, without compensation, even if the hardware itself still worked.
Plaintiffs argue that Amazon’s actions amount to unfair and deceptive business practices, claiming the company misled buyers by omitting the risk that the devices could be "bricked" long before the end of their useful life.
They also contend this conduct violated the implied promise that the products would continue to function as advertised, undermining the value of what consumers paid for.
The complaint further claims that Amazon’s decision to "brick" earlier-generation devices may have been intended to push customers into buying newer models.
Why you should care:
The plaintiffs are asking the court to certify the case as a class action, appoint a lead plaintiff and legal counsel, and award damages to affected consumers. They are also seeking restitution of profits Amazon allegedly made from the conduct, along with refunds for customers who purchased the devices.
RELATED: Amazon working on new phone years after Fire flop, new report says
In addition, the lawsuit asks the court to block Amazon from continuing the alleged practices and to grant any further relief deemed appropriate, including attorneys’ fees and costs. The plaintiff is also requesting a jury trial.
The other side:
FOX Television Stations reached out to Amazon for comment.
The backstory:
Last year, Amazon reached a historic $2.5 billion settlement with the Federal Trade Commission, which said the online retail giant tricked customers into signing up for its Prime memberships and made it difficult for them to cancel after doing so.
RELATED: Amazon launches 1-hour and 3-hour deliveries
The Seattle company agreed to pay $1 billion in civil penalties — the largest such fine in the agency’s history for a rule violation — and $1.5 billion will be paid back to consumers who were unintentionally enrolled in Prime, or were deterred from canceling their subscriptions, the agency said.
The Source: The information in this story primarily comes from a legal complaint filed in a California class action lawsuit, which was obtained and reviewed by FOX Television Stations. This story was reported from Los Angeles.