Expand / Collapse search
☰

Supreme Court signs off on White House ballroom construction continuing

By
FOX Local
Washington, D.C.
Published August 31, 2026 6:24 PM EDT
Published August 31, 2026 6:24 PM EDT
article

A view of the ongoing construction of a helipad (L) and ballroom (R) at the White House, as seen from the Washington Monument observation deck in Washington, DC on August 28, 2026. (Photo by Aaron Schwartz / AFP via Getty Images)

The Brief

    • The Supreme Court has ruled that construction may continue on the planned White House ballroom.
    • The majority said the Trump administration’s national security concerns outweighed those of the plaintiffs.
    • Chief Justice John Roberts criticized the decision as a potential violation of separation of powers.
    • The temporary order returns the case to lower courts where it will continue.

Construction of the new ballroom at the White House will continue following a temporary order by the Supreme Court that determined that the plaintiffs in the case, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, did not have the right to challenge the project.

What they're saying:

"I am pleased to report that the United States Supreme Court has just ruled in favor of the Ballroom/Military Complex being built without any further contingency, doubt, or threat," President Donald Trump wrote in response to the ruling.

The order was signed by Chief Justice John Roberts, who is responsible for appeals in Washington, D.C., but the nation’s top jurist made his displeasure known. In a dissent, Roberts declared, "Today’s decision is no victory for the separation of powers." 

Dig deeper:

The unsigned order does not settle the case. Instead, it returns the case to the lower courts. The order noted the government’s claims that the project involves national security with its planned military installation and location for events that are more secure than the tents used now.

RELATED: Check your piggy bank - You may have a rare 1969 penny worth up to $600,000

The order contrasts those concerns with those raised in the lawsuit. It framed the plaintiffs’ arguments as stating that they would suffer from having to view the structure with its scale, height, and massing.

The backstory:

The Trump administration turned to the Supreme Court after lower courts ruled that the executive branch did not have unilateral authority to do the construction. The plaintiffs’ lawyers have accused the White House of trying to accelerate construction and "outrun the courts." The administration has stated in filings that portions of the project can be completed in months.

The Source: Information for this article was taken from the Associated Press. This story was reported from Orlando.



 

Washington, D.C.Supreme Court